Verdictums

White-label evidence engine / Verdictums

Evidence AI built to survive the hearing.

Verdictums reads the scans, handwriting, and bodycam footage that ordinary OCR gives up on, and returns findings a lawyer can actually cite: page and line for documents, frame and second for video. Same input, same output, every time.

2

Processing pipelines

Documents / Video & Audio

1

Findings schema

One contract for every media type

Pinned

Model versions

Same input, same output

Hashed

Every operation

Append-only custody log

00 / The Problem

General-purpose AI wasn't built with a courtroom in mind.

One made-up citation is enough

A model that invents a source even once hands opposing counsel an easy afternoon. In evidence work there is no acceptable rate of fabrication. A finding either traces back to something real or it should not be in the output.

Off-the-shelf OCR quits early

The big document-AI services are excellent on clean, typed pages. Give them a water-stained scan, cursive in the margins, or a third-generation photocopy with Bates stamps and the accuracy falls off right where cases tend to turn.

No custody record, no comfort

Most AI tools cannot tell you what touched a file, when, or with which model version. Without that record, even a correct result is open to procedural attack.

How it works

From raw file to a finding you can put in front of a judge.

Step 1
MP4

bodycam_0347.mp4

2.4 GB

SHA-256recorded

Submit evidence

Send degraded PDFs, scans, bodycam video, or interview audio through a single API call. We hash the file the moment it arrives, and that hash opens its chain of custody.

Step 2
Exhibit A

The engine analyzes

The pipelines enhance, transcribe, and extract using a pinned model version, so the same input produces the same output no matter when you run it.

Step 3

Finding 12 of 47

Speaker 2 confirms location at 14:32

85%
cite 00:14:32hash a94fchain intact

Court-ready findings

Each finding comes with its citation, a confidence score, and its custody hash, packaged so counsel can stand behind it when questioned.

01 / The Engine

One engine for documents and video, with the same findings format for both.

Documents go through one pipeline, video and audio go through another, and both land in the same findings schema. Whatever the source, every claim in the output points back to where it came from.

Pipeline A

Document AI

Built for the material general-purpose OCR struggles with: faded and damaged scans, handwriting, dense tables, Bates-stamped productions, and pages that have already been redacted once.

  • Degraded scan and handwriting recognition
  • Table and structure extraction
  • Bates stamp indexing
  • Redaction detection and native redaction
  • Page-and-line citations on every finding

Pipeline B

Video & Audio

Bodycam, interview room, and surveillance footage on a single synchronized timeline. Redaction, transcription, and speaker attribution happen in one pass, so nothing drifts out of alignment.

  • Face and license-plate redaction
  • Audio redaction
  • Transcription with speaker attribution
  • Single synchronized timeline
  • Frame-and-second citations on every finding
Explore the engine in depth

02 / Defensibility

Built to hold up under cross-examination.

Pillar I

Deterministic

Model versions are pinned, so running the same file twice gives you the same bytes twice. You can prove it by comparing hashes rather than asking anyone to take your word for it.

Pillar II

Chain of Custody

Every operation on every file is written to a hash-chained, append-only log, from the moment it arrives to the moment it is exported. If anything is altered, the chain breaks and you can see where.

Pillar III

Citable

Each finding carries its source: page and line for documents, frame and second for media. Counsel can put the original in front of the court without hunting for it.

Read the defensibility standard

Inside the platform

Built for engineers, with counsel looking over our shoulder.

Integrate in a sprint

A REST API and one findings schema. Most teams have a working integration inside a sprint.

await verdictums.process({

artifact: "exhibit_a.pdf",

redact: ["faces", "plates"],

});_

REST APIWhite-label

Redaction & attribution

Faces, plates, and voices redacted; every line attributed.

Speaker 1 / 00:14:12

Speaker 2 / 00:14:32

"I was at the north entrance the whole time."

Citations47 / 47
Redactions12 applied
Determinismbyte-identical
Frame-second cites

Audit on every touch

Custody events are appended to the log as they happen and can be exported at any time.

Custody event

Artifact re-verified before export. Hash matches ingest record.

Artifactexhibit_a.pdf
Verified hasha94f...c21e
Actorapi_key_04
  • + Exportable audit log
  • + You verify, you decide, you file

03 / Licensing

Your brand. Our engine.

We don't sell to end users. Verdictums is licensed to the platforms they already use: e-discovery suites, public safety records systems, and FOIA processing tools. Partners integrate through our API and ship the capability under their own name.

  • API-first integration into your existing product
  • Fully white-label: your interface, your name
  • Unified findings schema for both media types
  • Built for e-discovery, public safety, and FOIA workloads
Licensing details

api.yourbrand.com

awaiting request

04 / The Pilot

Seven days on your hardest data, side by side with what you use today.

Pick the evidence your current tools handle worst. We run it through Verdictums and through the document-AI services you already rely on, on identical inputs, and send you the scored comparison. If we don't come out ahead on your material, you owe us nothing.

  1. Day 01

    Intake

    You choose the material. We hash every file on arrival and open a chain of custody before any processing starts.

  2. Days 02–06

    Benchmark

    Verdictums and your incumbent services run on the same inputs. Every output is scored against criteria we agree on up front.

  3. Day 07

    Verdict

    You get a side-by-side report with cited findings, reproducibility proofs, and a concrete integration path if you want to go further.

05 / Who It Serves

Three kinds of platform, one engine underneath.

Market 01

E-Discovery Platforms

Review suites that process millions of pages per matter. Verdictums takes on the documents that stall a review: degraded productions, handwritten exhibits, and material that has already been redacted once, and returns structure and citations reviewers can rely on.

  • Production-scale document ingestion
  • Bates-aware indexing
  • Privilege-safe redaction workflows

Market 02

Public Safety & Records

Agencies with more bodycam and interview-room footage than staff hours to review it. The engine redacts faces, plates, and audio in the pipeline, transcribes with speaker attribution, and keeps every clip on one synchronized, citable timeline.

  • Bodycam and surveillance processing
  • Native face, plate, and audio redaction
  • Frame-accurate disclosure packages

Market 03

FOIA & Disclosure

Processors working against statutory deadlines with exemption obligations. Verdictums speeds up review, and its audit trail shows that each withholding and release decision followed a repeatable, documented process.

  • Deadline-driven batch processing
  • Exemption-aware redaction support
  • Complete disclosure audit trail

06 / In Practice

Every second of footage, accounted for.

An hour of bodycam video comes back as a synchronized timeline: transcribed, attributed to speakers, redacted where the law requires it, and citable to the exact frame. Work that would normally take a paralegal days of scrubbing happens in a single pass, with a custody entry for each operation along the way.

  • Speaker-attributed transcription across the full timeline
  • Redactions applied in the pipeline, not as a cleanup step
  • Findings cite the frame and second, ready for the record
  • Reruns under the same model pin produce identical output

07 / Questions

The questions we get before every pilot.

These are the things platform and procurement teams tend to ask first. For anything deeper, the pilot exists so the engine can answer on your own data.

Ask something else
01Will our end users see Verdictums anywhere?+

No. We license only to platforms and integrate through an API. Your users see your interface and your brand; the engine does its work behind the scenes.

02What do you actually mean by "deterministic"?+

Model versions are pinned for each engagement. Run the same file through the same pinned version and you get byte-identical output. That is something you can demonstrate to a court, an auditor, or opposing counsel by comparing hashes.

03How are findings cited?+

Each finding carries its source location: page and line for documents, frame and second for media. The output schema has no room for an uncited claim, so a finding without a source simply cannot be produced.

04What happens to our data during the pilot?+

Pilot material goes through the same chain-of-custody controls as production work. Once the benchmark is done, the data is destroyed or returned on day seven, whichever the pilot agreement specifies.

05What do you benchmark against?+

Whatever you use today. Most pilots compare Verdictums against the major cloud document-AI services on identical inputs that you select, usually the material those services handle worst.

06Where is the company based, and who is behind it?+

Verdictums is based in Singapore and was founded in 2026 by Charles Armin. You can read more on the About page or reach the team directly at contact@verdictums.com.

If your platform touches evidence, its output should be able to take a hard question.